News,

The Lawyers' Christian Fellowship and Comment on Reproductive Ethics are seeking a high court judicial review of the UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's licence which let Newcastle university, scientists create animal-human embryos. The fellowship says the authority acted outside the law, which refers only to human embryos, not hybrids. Dr Evan Harris MP, Liberal Democrat, cites legal advice that the hybrids, which have only human DNA in their cell nuclei, are human in terms of current law. [Telegraph, 8 April] Catholics in Scotland should take into account MPs' stance on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology bill when they next vote, according to Cardinal Keith O'Brien, Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh. The cardinal writes that Catholic MPs must be mindful of church teaching on human life. Some Labour MPs have small majorities and the Scottish Nationalist Party is enjoying a surge in support. [Sunday Times, 6 April] The Episcopalian bishop of Aberdeen and Orkney, Scotland, claims that the cardinal is wrong about hybrids, saying: " Much as I may not like the thought of hybrid-embryo research ... perhaps that is the way we must go to help those most in need of a Christian, loving response." Professor Sheila McLean, the Scottish medical ethicist, agreed. [Scotsman, 9 April]

An American supreme court judge says there is no right to abortion in the US constitution. Speaking at a university in Rhode Island, Mr Antonin Scalia said the constitution was not an adaptable document but left abortion to the democratic process. People with views for or against abortion should persuade their fellow-citizens of the need for a law. [LifeNews, 8 April]

Abortion will be an issue at the Dominican Republic's presidential election next month. The Progressive Bloc parties want the matter raised, and the Catholic church is preparing to resist any change as it successfully did last year. [LifeSiteNews, 5 April]

Most Brazilians oppose abortion, according to a newspaper survey of more than 4,000 people. Folha de São Paulo found that 68% thought abortion should remain a crime, compared with 63% in 2006. Mr José Gomes Temporão, health minister, reportedly supports abortion. [LifeSiteNews, 7 April]

The US Food and Drug Administration is examining whether therapies developed from human embryos are safe. Current hearings in Ohio will consider if treatments cause tumours and whether animal testing of them has been adequate. [Nature, 8 April]

The Google search engine refused to carry anti-abortion advertising and the Christian Institute of Newcastle upon Tyne, England, is suing the company for religious discrimination. Google carries advertisements for abortion providers but says it has a policy against mixing abortion and religion. [Daily Mail, 8 April]

Belgian authorities are threatening parents with prison if they do not have their children vaccinated against polio. Children can be exempted if it is proved that they would suffer side-effects but conscientious objections are not respected. [AP on Rockford Register Star, 12 March] It is unclear whether vaccines used in Belgium are made using unethically obtained substances, especially tissue from aborted babies. Some parents in other countries have objected to polio vaccines on this basis.

To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2018