Traffic Light Guide to Charities

Many people want to support charities which do not go against their pro-life values. This updated guide has been prepared to help you in deciding which charities you would like to support.

The Traffic Light Guide includes only the stated or known stance and activities of the charities listed. The following ranking system is used to score the charities:

  • Caring Cancer Trust

    Green

    This charity confirmed in a letter dated 25/11/2018, that it does not “fund cancer research that involves the use of live animals or human embryos. Our funding is in fact conditional on receipt of certification to that effect from our funding beneficiaries. We do not support any organisation or charity that either funds or does such research, which we consider to be both unethical and immoral.”

  • Chest Heart and Stroke Scotland

    Amber

    In a letter dated 17/12/2018, this charity stated: “Currently CHSS do not have a specific human embryo experimentation policy, and we do not specifically exclude human embryo experimentation from the research we fund; so in theory, a project involving human embryo experimentation could be funded by CHSS through its research grants. However, after looking at the last 20 years of projects we cannot find that we have funded any.
    “… CHSS funds research projects at a number of universities in Scotland. We understand that some of these universities do, on projects funded by other organisations, carry out research involving human embryo experimentation.” [#AMRC#]

  • Childhood Eye Cancer Trust (CHECT)

    Amber

    In a letter dated 14/02/2019, this charity states: “CHECT has never funded any research that involves human embryo experimentation and is not currently funding any research in this area. We do not fund other organisations which use human embryos in research. As a result, we do not have a policy on the use of human embryos in research, but it is something our Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) will be looking at later this year.”
    The latest research strategy from the SAC (https://chect.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2019-research-strategy.pdf) does not mention embryo research. [#AMRC#].

  • ChildLine

    Red

    ChildLine “is a counselling service for children and young people up to their 19th birthday in the United Kingdom provided by the NSPCC”.
    The website directs young people to organisations which provide contraception and abortion to young people including under the age of consent and without parental knowledge or consent.
    https://www.childline.org.uk/info-advice/friends-relationships-sex/sex-relationships/abortion/
    https://www.childline.org.uk/info-advice/friends-relationships-sex/sex-relationships/contraception-safe-sex/
    An indication of the approach taken by ChildLine is given in their messaging on masturbation: “Both girls and boys masturbate and it’s completely natural.”
    https://www.childline.org.uk/info-advice/friends-relationships-sex/sex-relationships/sex/
    Information about pornography includes;
    “Some young people watch porn or are curious about it. It’s normal to want to know more, and it could make you feel anything from aroused to disgusted.
    “Watching porn can leave you with mixed feelings because it’s not something people usually talk about openly. You might feel:

    • excited or aroused by what you’ve seen
    • interested in watching different types of porn …”

    https://www.childline.org.uk/info-advice/bullying-abuse-safety/online-mobile-safety/online-porn/

  • Children Change Columbia

    Red

    This charity stated in a letter dated 17/10/2018 that it “will support organisations that provide education on sexual and reproductive health and rights, including information on contraception and birth control resources to children and young people”. This organisation’s partners all “provide information on sexual and reproductive rights and health issues”. And some of their partners “refer service users to family planning clinics or health centres for advice”.

  • Children with Cancer UK

    Amber

    The Children with Cancer UK website states: “We have never funded any research using human embryos. We have funded some work involving human embryonic stem cells. References to the use of ‘stem cells’ in our research generally refer to blood stem cells rather than embryonic stem cells.” https://www.childrenwithcancer.org.uk/research/research-faq/ [#AMRC#].

  • Children’s Society

    Unknown status

    We do not currently have details for this charity.

  • Christian Aid

    Red

    The following statements are taken from a five-page policy statement titled: “Christian Aid’s Policy on Family Planning”, published June 2015:
    “Reproductive health is vitally important in any discussion of global poverty and population levels.”
    “We believe that increasing access to modern methods of contraception is necessary, but not in itself sufficient, for individuals (and women in particular) to have power over their reproductive lives. For that, we believe, there must also be work done to stimulate demand.”
    “Christian Aid does not fund abortion clinics and does not regard abortion as a desirable form of birth control.”
    “In common with other ecumenical development and aid agencies, Christian Aid funds organisations that provide support to poor women in crisis to inform them of their legal rights, both in terms of advice on legal abortions as well as the risks of illegal abortions.”
    https://www.christianaid.org.uk/sites/default/files/2016-03/christian-aid-policy-on-family-planning-jun-2015.pdf

  • Chronic Disease Research Foundation (CDRF)

    Amber

    In a letter dated 25/2/2019 this charity stated: “We do not fund any research that uses human embryos, nor do we support any organisations that do this type of research. In almost every case CDRF-funded research uses adult volunteers from TwinsUK: a large group of identical and non-identical twins. Our method of collecting information is either by questionnaire, buccal swabs, blood tests, urine samples and faecal swabs for DNA analysis of either the subject or the subject’s gut microbiome. In some smaller studies, such as genetic causes of skin melanoma, we have used volunteers who already have the disease.” [#AMRC#]

  • Circulation Foundation

    Amber

    In a letter dated 10/6/19, this charity stated: “I can advise that I am unaware of any connection between the Circulation Foundation and human embryo experimentation, and therefore unable to provide a policy.”

  • CLIC Sargent Cancer Care for Children

    Green

    In a letter dated 26/6/2019 a member of the Support Engagement Team of this Bristol based charity stated: “I have looked into your questions about whether we are involved in abortion, human embryo experimentation or assisted dying. As CLIC Sargent is not a medical research charity or a provider of health services, we do not have a position on any of the issues you have asked about.”

  • Coeliac UK

    Amber

    In a letter dated 27/11/2018 this organisation stated: “We have not funded any research in the past involving the use of human embryos and currently cannot foresee any reason why we would in the future. The nature of coeliac disease is such that invariably research involves the study of patients and human populations.” [#AMRC#]

  • Colostomy UK

    Green

    In a letter dated 6/6/19, this charity stated: “The objects for which we are established are as described in our Memorandum of Association:
    1) to relieve the need of those who have a colostomy or other types of stoma and their families by the provision of support, reassurance and practical information;
    2) to preserve and protect the health of ostomates by providing and assisting in the provision of facilities support services not normally provided by the statutory authorities;
    3) to advance the education of the public in the subject of colostomies and other types of abdominal stomas;
    4) to advance the education of the public healthcare such as medical professionals.
    I can assure you that all donations are used to support these objectives only.”

  • Comic Relief

    Amber

    Comic Relief is a fund-raising company which transfers all its profits to the registered charity called Charity Projects. Comic Relief organises Red Nose Day in “odd” years (2015, 2017, 2019 etc.) and Sport Relief in “even” years (2014, 2016, 2018 etc.). While the two fundraising events may seem different, they are for all practical intents and purposes the same as they both exist to raise money for Comic Relief.
    The money raised in Comic Relief’s fundraising campaigns is paid out in grants to thousands of exterior charities. While not all of these charities will engage in activities which would concern the pro-life community, other charities will be associated with anti-life practices.
    Red Nose Day is the BBC’s biannual fundraising extravaganza for Comic Relief. The BBC also hosts Children in Need. Comic Relief gives grants to national and international charities, whereas Children in Need deals with smaller national charities.

  • Compassion UK

    Green

    In an email dated 3/6/19, this charity stated: “We strongly believe in the sanctity of life. A core part of our mission is to protect and preserve children’s lives at all stages of development. Therefore, frontline Church Partners do not condone or facilitate abortions.
    “We believe that life begins in the womb at conception, all life is created by God and made in his image with a purpose and destiny. We believe that baby has a great value and is a life Jesus died to save.
    “Although our main focus is on releasing children from poverty, we also have Child Survival programmes set up in the countries we work in to help protect vulnerable babies and mothers. Mothers receive care and support throughout their pregnancy up until the baby is one year old we focus on supporting the mothers and protecting these babies from the time they are in the womb up until one year.”