A recent New York Times profile tells the deeply troubling story of Tatiana Andia, a cancer patient in Colombia, who chose medical assistance in dying (MAiD) a practice that the country has permitted since 2015 under court rulings. Colombia remains the only nation in Latin America where euthanasia is legal, and uniquely it allows non‑terminal and paediatric cases through administrative resolutions rather than statute.
From a pro‑life standpoint, the story raises serious ethical and societal concerns. SPUC has consistently warned that assisted suicide and euthanasia, even when medically framed as “compassionate”, inevitably erodes the value placed on the most vulnerable. SPUC stresses that legal sanctioning of lethal means for those in pain can pressure disabled individuals, the mentally ill, and the elderly into viewing death as a duty, rather than a tragedy to be prevented
Colombia’s MAiD model includes safeguards, committee reviews and conscientious objections but advocates argue these often fail to protect truly vulnerable people. SPUC highlight a trend across jurisdictions: what begins as narrowly defined provision for terminal illness steadily expands to include those with chronic disabilities and mental health issues. The enabling of euthanasia for minors or those lacking informed decision-making underscores a broader moral slippery slope.
The story of Tatiana Andia serves as a caution: even where MAiD is tightly regulated, the lived reality is that options for care and comfort are too often insufficient, and administrative frameworks cannot substitute for real robust societal life-affirming support. SPUC calls on policymakers worldwide to learn from this: legal frameworks must elevate protections, not offer state‑sanctioned death as a “solution.”
Pro‑life voices argue that the legalization of assisted suicide, even under strong procedural controls, weakens societal resolve to care for those in suffering. Where the medical system can default to ending life, genuine compassion is obscured. Instead, true care should expand hospice care, disability inclusion, and community support.
Many stories often paint a picture that assisted dying, far from easing suffering, often reflects a broader failure of systems to support the vulnerable. For SPUC and other pro‑life advocates, the answer isn’t death with dignity, but dignity in life, through care, community and medical integrity.
As global debates over assisted suicide intensifies, SPUC urges respect for human life at every stage. Legal protections for the vulnerable must precede any discussion about enabling their deaths.
If you’re reading this and haven’t yet donated to SPUC, please consider helping now. Thank You!
